Kevin's Place

Thanks for your reblogs, Sir. I don’t know if I interpret them correctly as an invitation for dialog, and if so I don’t know whether you’d prefer it to be public or private. Either way, I hope you weren’t offended by my “Your sub = my dom” comment—I really only meant to restate my interest in the twinkish/slender&youthful-type dom (which is my ideal but hardly my exclusive preference). There’s something satisfying about submitting to such doms beyond the physical attraction—it’s almost like I recognize the possibility of their being subjugated by a more butch-type dom, making me then a sub to a dom who has been made a sub.

Oh, and “limitless” is unfortunately still aspirational. But I’m working on it, Sir. And sorry to perhaps misuse the submit feature but for some reason the fanmail feature always errors out when I try to send it.

Pretty much everything I do here is an invitation to dialogue, and I enjoy chatting in public, and will generally do so unless the other person asks me to keep it private, or it’s a first contact and seems really personal.

I took no offence at all to your post. I often refer to “Alpha pups,” guys that are submissive enough for me to enjoy them, but with enough Dom in them to want to turn the tables on others. Just as I don’t believe in 100% gay or straight, I don’t believe in 100% Dom or sub. Everything is on a sliding scale, with some of us close enough to the ends that the other side is rarely visible. I was very submissive when I was young, now I am not at all submissive, but there is still the odd guy around that I’d be willing to flip for if that was the only way to get naked and sweaty with them.

I think I take limitless in the spirit you intend it. Clearly there’s no such thing as “limitless” unless a person is terribly damaged. Even the most submissive person should have no desire to be truly injured in anything approaching a lasting fashion. Sex should always be fun for everybody at the end of the day.